For one, the vast majority of women are androphiles and for agps that’s jot remotely true so that makes no sense
For 2, agp is a sexuality not just a fetish and therefore also has non sexual romantic aspects and idk maybe I’m crazy but I don’t think most cis women are attracted to themselves in an autoromantic sense
For 3, the moser study is nonsense
Women liking tall men and feeling feminine doesn’t make them autogynephiles 😭
So are you just ignoring the fact that I literally eas romantically and sexually attracted to myself as a woman because it doesn’t it your narrative… not very falisable…
Also you have no experiences to discount you just said that
seriously, I can’t believe this is it. really. you looked into all the flaws this “theory” has and said. well it’s true because it applies to me? holy mother of confirmation bias.
You’re sat here denying that it applies to me because its existence upsets you lmao you’re doing the same thing blanchard does
points out the many reasons the pseudoscience is disregarded by modern psychology at large heh… you’re literally just using your feelings. just like him… proceeds to say agp is real because I am AGP kek
it’s real because… it just is okay! it’s laughed at in premiere psychologicsl institutions and in the larger neuroscience world because they don’t have ME. THE ONE TRUE AGP AS PROOF
Ok so am I personally not attracted to myself even though I am because what, some psycologist didn’t like blanchards methodology?? Lmao
proven invalid multiple times well like okay just because it’s wrong it’s wrong? its literally real bc I said so. are you being genuine or is this ragebait?
it’s real, okay! I said so! anything that proves it wrong… they must be lying! all of them! when I make objective claims about reality, they are correct because… because they just are, okay? you’re telling just because every profession that shaped the landscape I’d the field says it’s pseudoscience and incorrect, I should just fall in line like a sheep! no!
I mean, the “proof” thst agp isnt real is kinda…
Also why does thst mean the things I’ve experienced aren’t real, disregarded award
because you describing yourself with a the category of AGP doesn’t prove it right or actually even prove the concept alone exists. you’re being disregarded in relation to the theory, not your experience.
Ok so can I be agp without agp being real then? That doesn’t seem to make any sense…
that’s not how it works, genius. dear God.
erm, actually agp is real cus I’m agp. phrenology is actually real because I’m black.
Do you deny that I wss attracted to myself as a woman? Like that’s a measurable experience thst I had that you’re just denying the existence of
“Phrenology” isn’t something you experience
deleted by creator