For one, the vast majority of women are androphiles and for agps that’s jot remotely true so that makes no sense

For 2, agp is a sexuality not just a fetish and therefore also has non sexual romantic aspects and idk maybe I’m crazy but I don’t think most cis women are attracted to themselves in an autoromantic sense

For 3, the moser study is nonsense

Women liking tall men and feeling feminine doesn’t make them autogynephiles 😭

  • pleasantaftertastes
    2·
    7 days ago

    proven invalid multiple times well like okay just because it’s wrong it’s wrong? its literally real bc I said so. are you being genuine or is this ragebait?

    • pleasantaftertastes
      2·
      7 days ago

      it’s real, okay! I said so! anything that proves it wrong… they must be lying! all of them! when I make objective claims about reality, they are correct because… because they just are, okay? you’re telling just because every profession that shaped the landscape I’d the field says it’s pseudoscience and incorrect, I should just fall in line like a sheep! no!

    • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
      11·
      7 days ago

      I mean, the “proof” thst agp isnt real is kinda…

      Also why does thst mean the things I’ve experienced aren’t real, disregarded award

      • pleasantaftertastes
        2·
        7 days ago

        because you describing yourself with a the category of AGP doesn’t prove it right or actually even prove the concept alone exists. you’re being disregarded in relation to the theory, not your experience.

        • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
          1·
          7 days ago

          Ok so can I be agp without agp being real then? That doesn’t seem to make any sense…

            • pleasantaftertastes
              2·
              7 days ago

              I think this is a category error. you’re arguing like this theory and credence or could be correct and I’m not.

            • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
              11·
              7 days ago

              So you think im lying and are disregarding my experiences to fit your narrative?

              • pleasantaftertastes
                2·
                7 days ago

                do… do you consider yourself and the concept of AGP intertwined? You know your anecdote alone isn’t capable of completely supporting and proving an objective claim right? do you seriously reason that because I sent the dogmatic nature of this typology, I’m causing you a liar and acting in bad faith?

                • pleasantaftertastes
                  2·
                  7 days ago

                  it’s not that I don’t care about what you feel or anything, I just don’t care about this theory because it’s wrong.

                • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
                  1·
                  7 days ago

                  I mean yeah because I have it? Denying it’s real at all can literally only be done if you think im a liar, you also aren’t saying the typology is wrong you’re saying it’s not real period

                  • pleasantaftertastes
                    1·
                    7 days ago

                    it’s the same thing. I think you’re incorrect, not a liar. and I know I’m right. these works are fallacious and entirely built on logic traps. the only way they can be reasoned is if you’re willing to accept them as possible.