For one, the vast majority of women are androphiles and for agps that’s jot remotely true so that makes no sense

For 2, agp is a sexuality not just a fetish and therefore also has non sexual romantic aspects and idk maybe I’m crazy but I don’t think most cis women are attracted to themselves in an autoromantic sense

For 3, the moser study is nonsense

Women liking tall men and feeling feminine doesn’t make them autogynephiles 😭

  • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    I mean, the “proof” thst agp isnt real is kinda…

    Also why does thst mean the things I’ve experienced aren’t real, disregarded award

    • pleasantaftertastes
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      because you describing yourself with a the category of AGP doesn’t prove it right or actually even prove the concept alone exists. you’re being disregarded in relation to the theory, not your experience.

      • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Ok so can I be agp without agp being real then? That doesn’t seem to make any sense…

          • pleasantaftertastes
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            14 days ago

            I think this is a category error. you’re arguing like this theory and credence or could be correct and I’m not.

          • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            So you think im lying and are disregarding my experiences to fit your narrative?

            • pleasantaftertastes
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 days ago

              do… do you consider yourself and the concept of AGP intertwined? You know your anecdote alone isn’t capable of completely supporting and proving an objective claim right? do you seriously reason that because I sent the dogmatic nature of this typology, I’m causing you a liar and acting in bad faith?

              • pleasantaftertastes
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                14 days ago

                it’s not that I don’t care about what you feel or anything, I just don’t care about this theory because it’s wrong.

              • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                14 days ago

                I mean yeah because I have it? Denying it’s real at all can literally only be done if you think im a liar, you also aren’t saying the typology is wrong you’re saying it’s not real period

                • pleasantaftertastes
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  it’s the same thing. I think you’re incorrect, not a liar. and I know I’m right. these works are fallacious and entirely built on logic traps. the only way they can be reasoned is if you’re willing to accept them as possible.

                  • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    14 days ago

                    How can I be incorrect about the fact that I was attracted to myself as a woman that’s just a thing that happend, I can not call it agp if it’d make you feel better? I’m just an autosexual gynephile