For one, the vast majority of women are androphiles and for agps that’s jot remotely true so that makes no sense

For 2, agp is a sexuality not just a fetish and therefore also has non sexual romantic aspects and idk maybe I’m crazy but I don’t think most cis women are attracted to themselves in an autoromantic sense

For 3, the moser study is nonsense

Women liking tall men and feeling feminine doesn’t make them autogynephiles 😭

  • pleasantaftertastes
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    do… do you consider yourself and the concept of AGP intertwined? You know your anecdote alone isn’t capable of completely supporting and proving an objective claim right? do you seriously reason that because I sent the dogmatic nature of this typology, I’m causing you a liar and acting in bad faith?

    • pleasantaftertastes
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      it’s not that I don’t care about what you feel or anything, I just don’t care about this theory because it’s wrong.

    • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I mean yeah because I have it? Denying it’s real at all can literally only be done if you think im a liar, you also aren’t saying the typology is wrong you’re saying it’s not real period

      • pleasantaftertastes
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        it’s the same thing. I think you’re incorrect, not a liar. and I know I’m right. these works are fallacious and entirely built on logic traps. the only way they can be reasoned is if you’re willing to accept them as possible.

        • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          How can I be incorrect about the fact that I was attracted to myself as a woman that’s just a thing that happend, I can not call it agp if it’d make you feel better? I’m just an autosexual gynephile