For one, the vast majority of women are androphiles and for agps that’s jot remotely true so that makes no sense

For 2, agp is a sexuality not just a fetish and therefore also has non sexual romantic aspects and idk maybe I’m crazy but I don’t think most cis women are attracted to themselves in an autoromantic sense

For 3, the moser study is nonsense

Women liking tall men and feeling feminine doesn’t make them autogynephiles 😭

  • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Ok so am I personally not attracted to myself even though I am because what, some psycologist didn’t like blanchards methodology?? Lmao

    • pleasantaftertastes
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      proven invalid multiple times well like okay just because it’s wrong it’s wrong? its literally real bc I said so. are you being genuine or is this ragebait?

      • pleasantaftertastes
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        it’s real, okay! I said so! anything that proves it wrong… they must be lying! all of them! when I make objective claims about reality, they are correct because… because they just are, okay? you’re telling just because every profession that shaped the landscape I’d the field says it’s pseudoscience and incorrect, I should just fall in line like a sheep! no!

      • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        I mean, the “proof” thst agp isnt real is kinda…

        Also why does thst mean the things I’ve experienced aren’t real, disregarded award

        • pleasantaftertastes
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          because you describing yourself with a the category of AGP doesn’t prove it right or actually even prove the concept alone exists. you’re being disregarded in relation to the theory, not your experience.

          • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            Ok so can I be agp without agp being real then? That doesn’t seem to make any sense…

              • pleasantaftertastes
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 days ago

                I think this is a category error. you’re arguing like this theory and credence or could be correct and I’m not.

              • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 days ago

                So you think im lying and are disregarding my experiences to fit your narrative?

                • pleasantaftertastes
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  do… do you consider yourself and the concept of AGP intertwined? You know your anecdote alone isn’t capable of completely supporting and proving an objective claim right? do you seriously reason that because I sent the dogmatic nature of this typology, I’m causing you a liar and acting in bad faith?

                  • pleasantaftertastes
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    9 days ago

                    it’s not that I don’t care about what you feel or anything, I just don’t care about this theory because it’s wrong.

                  • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    9 days ago

                    I mean yeah because I have it? Denying it’s real at all can literally only be done if you think im a liar, you also aren’t saying the typology is wrong you’re saying it’s not real period