For one, the vast majority of women are androphiles and for agps that’s jot remotely true so that makes no sense

For 2, agp is a sexuality not just a fetish and therefore also has non sexual romantic aspects and idk maybe I’m crazy but I don’t think most cis women are attracted to themselves in an autoromantic sense

For 3, the moser study is nonsense

Women liking tall men and feeling feminine doesn’t make them autogynephiles 😭

  • pleasantaftertastes
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    seriously, I can’t believe this is it. really. you looked into all the flaws this “theory” has and said. well it’s true because it applies to me? holy mother of confirmation bias.

    • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      You’re sat here denying that it applies to me because its existence upsets you lmao you’re doing the same thing blanchard does

      • pleasantaftertastes
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        points out the many reasons the pseudoscience is disregarded by modern psychology at large heh… you’re literally just using your feelings. just like him… proceeds to say agp is real because I am AGP kek

        • pleasantaftertastes
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          it’s real because… it just is okay! it’s laughed at in premiere psychologicsl institutions and in the larger neuroscience world because they don’t have ME. THE ONE TRUE AGP AS PROOF

        • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Ok so am I personally not attracted to myself even though I am because what, some psycologist didn’t like blanchards methodology?? Lmao

          • pleasantaftertastes
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            proven invalid multiple times well like okay just because it’s wrong it’s wrong? its literally real bc I said so. are you being genuine or is this ragebait?

            • pleasantaftertastes
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              it’s real, okay! I said so! anything that proves it wrong… they must be lying! all of them! when I make objective claims about reality, they are correct because… because they just are, okay? you’re telling just because every profession that shaped the landscape I’d the field says it’s pseudoscience and incorrect, I should just fall in line like a sheep! no!

            • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              I mean, the “proof” thst agp isnt real is kinda…

              Also why does thst mean the things I’ve experienced aren’t real, disregarded award

              • pleasantaftertastes
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                because you describing yourself with a the category of AGP doesn’t prove it right or actually even prove the concept alone exists. you’re being disregarded in relation to the theory, not your experience.