For one, the vast majority of women are androphiles and for agps that’s jot remotely true so that makes no sense

For 2, agp is a sexuality not just a fetish and therefore also has non sexual romantic aspects and idk maybe I’m crazy but I don’t think most cis women are attracted to themselves in an autoromantic sense

For 3, the moser study is nonsense

Women liking tall men and feeling feminine doesn’t make them autogynephiles 😭

  • pleasantaftertastes
    2·
    18 days ago

    points out the many reasons the pseudoscience is disregarded by modern psychology at large heh… you’re literally just using your feelings. just like him… proceeds to say agp is real because I am AGP kek

    • pleasantaftertastes
      2·
      18 days ago

      it’s real because… it just is okay! it’s laughed at in premiere psychologicsl institutions and in the larger neuroscience world because they don’t have ME. THE ONE TRUE AGP AS PROOF

    • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
      11·
      18 days ago

      Ok so am I personally not attracted to myself even though I am because what, some psycologist didn’t like blanchards methodology?? Lmao

      • pleasantaftertastes
        2·
        18 days ago

        proven invalid multiple times well like okay just because it’s wrong it’s wrong? its literally real bc I said so. are you being genuine or is this ragebait?

        • pleasantaftertastes
          2·
          18 days ago

          it’s real, okay! I said so! anything that proves it wrong… they must be lying! all of them! when I make objective claims about reality, they are correct because… because they just are, okay? you’re telling just because every profession that shaped the landscape I’d the field says it’s pseudoscience and incorrect, I should just fall in line like a sheep! no!

        • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
          11·
          18 days ago

          I mean, the “proof” thst agp isnt real is kinda…

          Also why does thst mean the things I’ve experienced aren’t real, disregarded award

          • pleasantaftertastes
            2·
            18 days ago

            because you describing yourself with a the category of AGP doesn’t prove it right or actually even prove the concept alone exists. you’re being disregarded in relation to the theory, not your experience.

            • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
              1·
              18 days ago

              Ok so can I be agp without agp being real then? That doesn’t seem to make any sense…

                • pleasantaftertastes
                  2·
                  18 days ago

                  I think this is a category error. you’re arguing like this theory and credence or could be correct and I’m not.

                • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
                  11·
                  18 days ago

                  So you think im lying and are disregarding my experiences to fit your narrative?

                  • pleasantaftertastes
                    2·
                    18 days ago

                    do… do you consider yourself and the concept of AGP intertwined? You know your anecdote alone isn’t capable of completely supporting and proving an objective claim right? do you seriously reason that because I sent the dogmatic nature of this typology, I’m causing you a liar and acting in bad faith?