For one, the vast majority of women are androphiles and for agps that’s jot remotely true so that makes no sense

For 2, agp is a sexuality not just a fetish and therefore also has non sexual romantic aspects and idk maybe I’m crazy but I don’t think most cis women are attracted to themselves in an autoromantic sense

For 3, the moser study is nonsense

Women liking tall men and feeling feminine doesn’t make them autogynephiles 😭

  • pleasantaftertastes
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 days ago

    open the schools. the most base and core part of any theory is that must be falsifiable. This theory is literally impossible to prove wrong, and that’s on purpose. the researcher is always right.

    • pleasantaftertastes
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      the theory can’t categorize anybody. sloppy, lacking nuance. all of it is based on a comparison from straight cis men to trans women. most of it Blanchard doesn’t even believe in anymore. Like usual, this is another psychologist trying to think of literally everything through the lens of a man’s dick. and you people eat it up.

    • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I don’t think it’s entirely possibly to even make a theory of why people transition be falsifiable fully because it has to rely on anecdotal evidence, so unless literally everything everyone has ever said about trans people is also bullshit idk what exactly you want

      • pleasantaftertastes
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        the problem is that Anne and the theory itself EXPLICITLY DISCOUNT ANY ANECDOTE THAT DISAGREES

        • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          Ok but troons do lie all the time actually how do you account for that… and what about rhe annecodates that do I mean you’re telling me I don’t have it when I literally do, aren’t you the same?

              • its_ogre
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 days ago

                This is where their brain short-circuits because they can’t possible think that someone would actually have agp. That’s the disconnect, people saying agp isn’t real just didn’t experience it because they’re trutranssexual and have no way of relating. I literally WAS AGP from 10-12, then repressed everything before it turned into raging dysphoria at 21. Every time I mention this I get ignored

          • pleasantaftertastes
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            oh screw off. this entire “theory” is purely false. your defense of it is fallacious and biased. “well actually I am AGP because it applies to me” well I’m actually a type three subhuman because I’m east African! whoa! isn’t science neat? we look for the best explanation that fits the most data. a “theory” that debunks itself is one big meme. the idea that “well, they actually are all lying and doing it for sexual reasons” is more reactionary than any rightoid.

            • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 days ago

              And what do you do to the people who don’t fit that theory? Do you just entirely disregard them? Again what about the people who fit agp and are lol, do you think im lying and are gonna disregard what I say?

              • pleasantaftertastes
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 days ago

                the people who don’t fall under this theory are called liars doing it for sexual reasons. you have this odd axiom this theory is correct that you continue to assert (E.g ARE agp) there no ground for this theory. did you know I was a stupid black person? please stop discounting phrenological subhuman experiences. your anecdote can’t save the massive flaws in this garbage crackpot theory.

                • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  So are you just ignoring the fact that I literally eas romantically and sexually attracted to myself as a woman because it doesn’t it your narrative… not very falisable…

                  Also you have no experiences to discount you just said that

                  • pleasantaftertastes
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 days ago

                    seriously, I can’t believe this is it. really. you looked into all the flaws this “theory” has and said. well it’s true because it applies to me? holy mother of confirmation bias.

            • pleasantaftertastes
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 days ago

              this guy and this lady have the most patriarchal and gross “theory” I have ever seen.