>Be me, John 44.
>Transition anyway because you’re super rich from anesthesiologist work
>Abandon wife and kids like a boss.
>see Ray Blanchard’s work.
>Your new bible.JPEG
>Call trannies men in dresses who just have a fetish because you can’t imagine being trans without seeing it through sex.
>assert your theory as objective fact
>all evidence that contradicts is made up or a lie
>it’s so shit even TERFs don’t bother using it as ammo
>only believed by those with serious brainworms because it’s a meme scientifically.
>don’t apply it to yourself
>retire happy
Praise be, she is the queen even above Blanchard. If you like Blanchard more, you’re sexist.
Because people who don’t believe in agp would never ever ever ever do this…
LMAOOOOO
AGP is real because I’m agp and you’re discounting my experience. it’s fundamentally opposed to science? I don’t care! it makes me feel good!
Isn’t it fundamentally opposed to science because it calls people liars which is exactly what you’re doing as we speak
No, it’s not fundamentally opposed to science to… call people out for lying or using logic traps. they need to open the schools. This entire “theory” is an unfalsifiable mess. anyone who calls them out is a liar pervert
trans women feeling good as women = AGP and you believed it. unbelievable. If a trans woman admits to sexual feelings, the theory says: “See? It’s a fetish.” If a trans woman denies sexual feelings, the theory says: “She’s lying or ‘repressing’ her fetish.” world’s most basic logic loop, holy. this alone instantly makes it not actual science. Carl popper is turning in his grave. it’s the laziest possible diagnostic tool
That’s literally not what happened, again you’re just calling me a liar. I WAS LITERALLY ATTRACTED TO MYSELF AS A WOMAN, IT WASNY JUST FEELING GOOD OR SEXUAL FEELINGS
God, I love being a liar outlier who’s lying because I don’t fit the narrative
outlier to what? what am I supposed to do with this? like believe the theory that the creator doesn’t believe in? it was made when the guy was half drunk! I’m not calling you a liar! you could be a similar concept, sure!
It’s not a similar concept though?? Ts is so stupid. “Yes you’re agp but you can’t call yourself that because it’s bad ok! That challenges my worldview!”
Sorry for having experiences which are fundamentally opposed to science ig I’ll let my sexuality know it’s not real and a liar!
This is very different from what blanchard does
The concept of AGP as described by Blanchard appealing to the natural world is false. if you have a similar phenomena, sure whatever. it would be a separate concept separate from his assertions and typology though. if you’re a proud AGP go nuts, I’d be interested in seeing how you explore how the concept applies to you. but I don’t think you understand that me saying that this theory is wrong doesn’t invalidate you at all. you’re life experience isn’t AGP because AGP is nonsense that even it’d creator agrees is nonsense. it’s unscientific as an objective typology. yes, this is very clearly different from what he does.
So am I an autosexual gynephile but I can’t call myself agp even though that’s what it is because, uhhh that’s bad ok!
Also “similar phenomina” literally can’t even bring yourself to say it applies 😭
I was trying to appease you, but it’s clear that’s not going to happen. I don’t care if you’re an auto sexual gynephile. what I do care about is recognizing this concept as described does not apply to all trans women in the way that it’s described. it’s demeaning and disgusting. Like, what do I say? actually, it’s correct because you call yourself AGP? like what? I can’t win here