>Be me, John 44.

>Transition anyway because you’re super rich from anesthesiologist work

>Abandon wife and kids like a boss.

>see Ray Blanchard’s work.

>Your new bible.JPEG

>Call trannies men in dresses who just have a fetish because you can’t imagine being trans without seeing it through sex.

>assert your theory as objective fact

>all evidence that contradicts is made up or a lie

>it’s so shit even TERFs don’t bother using it as ammo

>only believed by those with serious brainworms because it’s a meme scientifically.

>don’t apply it to yourself

>retire happy

Praise be, she is the queen even above Blanchard. If you like Blanchard more, you’re sexist.

  • pleasantaftertastesOP
    2·
    6 days ago

    The concept of AGP as described by Blanchard appealing to the natural world is false. if you have a similar phenomena, sure whatever. it would be a separate concept separate from his assertions and typology though. if you’re a proud AGP go nuts, I’d be interested in seeing how you explore how the concept applies to you. but I don’t think you understand that me saying that this theory is wrong doesn’t invalidate you at all. you’re life experience isn’t AGP because AGP is nonsense that even it’d creator agrees is nonsense. it’s unscientific as an objective typology. yes, this is very clearly different from what he does.

    • Loose_Sandwich9217
      1·
      6 days ago

      So am I an autosexual gynephile but I can’t call myself agp even though that’s what it is because, uhhh that’s bad ok!

      Also “similar phenomina” literally can’t even bring yourself to say it applies 😭

      • pleasantaftertastesOP
        2·
        6 days ago

        I was trying to appease you, but it’s clear that’s not going to happen. I don’t care if you’re an auto sexual gynephile. what I do care about is recognizing this concept as described does not apply to all trans women in the way that it’s described. it’s demeaning and disgusting. Like, what do I say? actually, it’s correct because you call yourself AGP? like what? I can’t win here

        • Loose_Sandwich9217
          3·
          6 days ago

          That the concept is literally real?? Like you’re repeatedly saying jts not real ever outright when that literally cannot be true without me being a liar

          • pleasantaftertastesOP
            2·
            6 days ago

            you’re wrong, not a liar. if this concept is correct (which it isn’t) it either applies to all trans women everywhere and cannot be falsified or it’s wrong. the latter is far more plausible.

            • Loose_Sandwich9217
              2·
              6 days ago

              Utterly retarded logic why js thst true

              Also how exactly am I wrong? Was I delusional when I experienced autosexual gynephilic attraction? Basically the same as calling me a liar

              • DysphoriaGirl
                1·
                6 days ago

                I think the solution here is that we are observing a phenomenon in you that autogynephilia as a concept describes but in reality it also interprets it and thereby the way we conceptualize your experience is not objective and your own perception of it is mediated through the framework that you’ve internalized seeing it through…

                Pat is arguing that the interpretation of your experience is wrong because the concept is flawed, not that you experience doesn’t exist…

                Just that it would be more favorable to interpet it through a different framework