>Be me, John 44.
>Transition anyway because you’re super rich from anesthesiologist work
>Abandon wife and kids like a boss.
>see Ray Blanchard’s work.
>Your new bible.JPEG
>Call trannies men in dresses who just have a fetish because you can’t imagine being trans without seeing it through sex.
>assert your theory as objective fact
>all evidence that contradicts is made up or a lie
>it’s so shit even TERFs don’t bother using it as ammo
>only believed by those with serious brainworms because it’s a meme scientifically.
>don’t apply it to yourself
>retire happy
Praise be, she is the queen even above Blanchard. If you like Blanchard more, you’re sexist.
Isn’t it fundamentally opposed to science because it calls people liars which is exactly what you’re doing as we speak
No, it’s not fundamentally opposed to science to… call people out for lying or using logic traps. they need to open the schools. This entire “theory” is an unfalsifiable mess. anyone who calls them out is a liar pervert
trans women feeling good as women = AGP and you believed it. unbelievable. If a trans woman admits to sexual feelings, the theory says: “See? It’s a fetish.” If a trans woman denies sexual feelings, the theory says: “She’s lying or ‘repressing’ her fetish.” world’s most basic logic loop, holy. this alone instantly makes it not actual science. Carl popper is turning in his grave. it’s the laziest possible diagnostic tool
That’s literally not what happened, again you’re just calling me a liar. I WAS LITERALLY ATTRACTED TO MYSELF AS A WOMAN, IT WASNY JUST FEELING GOOD OR SEXUAL FEELINGS
God, I love being a liar outlier who’s lying because I don’t fit the narrative
outlier to what? what am I supposed to do with this? like believe the theory that the creator doesn’t believe in? it was made when the guy was half drunk! I’m not calling you a liar! you could be a similar concept, sure!
It’s not a similar concept though?? Ts is so stupid. “Yes you’re agp but you can’t call yourself that because it’s bad ok! That challenges my worldview!”
you’re right, there’s no point in trying to give up ground. there is no agp.
these concepts were rejected by the creator. You calling yourself AGP has as much impact on me as me saying I am subhuman as per phrenology
Phronology isn’t something you experience agp is
Very very different from blanchard lmao, sorry for having experiences that hurt your feelings ig
this is scientific fact for all trans women is what Blanchard is arguing. do you seriously believe that to be the case? that all trans women are HSTS or AGP? do you seriously actually believe that?
deleted by creator
Sorry for having experiences which are fundamentally opposed to science ig I’ll let my sexuality know it’s not real and a liar!
This is very different from what blanchard does
The concept of AGP as described by Blanchard appealing to the natural world is false. if you have a similar phenomena, sure whatever. it would be a separate concept separate from his assertions and typology though. if you’re a proud AGP go nuts, I’d be interested in seeing how you explore how the concept applies to you. but I don’t think you understand that me saying that this theory is wrong doesn’t invalidate you at all. you’re life experience isn’t AGP because AGP is nonsense that even it’d creator agrees is nonsense. it’s unscientific as an objective typology. yes, this is very clearly different from what he does.
So am I an autosexual gynephile but I can’t call myself agp even though that’s what it is because, uhhh that’s bad ok!
Also “similar phenomina” literally can’t even bring yourself to say it applies 😭
I was trying to appease you, but it’s clear that’s not going to happen. I don’t care if you’re an auto sexual gynephile. what I do care about is recognizing this concept as described does not apply to all trans women in the way that it’s described. it’s demeaning and disgusting. Like, what do I say? actually, it’s correct because you call yourself AGP? like what? I can’t win here
That the concept is literally real?? Like you’re repeatedly saying jts not real ever outright when that literally cannot be true without me being a liar
you’re wrong, not a liar. if this concept is correct (which it isn’t) it either applies to all trans women everywhere and cannot be falsified or it’s wrong. the latter is far more plausible.
Utterly retarded logic why js thst true
Also how exactly am I wrong? Was I delusional when I experienced autosexual gynephilic attraction? Basically the same as calling me a liar