>Be me, John 44.

>Transition anyway because you’re super rich from anesthesiologist work

>Abandon wife and kids like a boss.

>see Ray Blanchard’s work.

>Your new bible.JPEG

>Call trannies men in dresses who just have a fetish because you can’t imagine being trans without seeing it through sex.

>assert your theory as objective fact

>all evidence that contradicts is made up or a lie

>it’s so shit even TERFs don’t bother using it as ammo

>only believed by those with serious brainworms because it’s a meme scientifically.

>don’t apply it to yourself

>retire happy

Praise be, she is the queen even above Blanchard. If you like Blanchard more, you’re sexist.

  • pleasantaftertastesOP
    2·
    13 days ago

    outlier to what? what am I supposed to do with this? like believe the theory that the creator doesn’t believe in? it was made when the guy was half drunk! I’m not calling you a liar! you could be a similar concept, sure!

    • Loose_Sandwich9217
      1·
      13 days ago

      It’s not a similar concept though?? Ts is so stupid. “Yes you’re agp but you can’t call yourself that because it’s bad ok! That challenges my worldview!”

        • pleasantaftertastesOP
          1·
          13 days ago

          these concepts were rejected by the creator. You calling yourself AGP has as much impact on me as me saying I am subhuman as per phrenology

              • Loose_Sandwich9217
                1·
                13 days ago

                It wss white people measrujgn skullss that’s not an experience you have, agp is literally my sexuality which I have experienced

                • pleasantaftertastesOP
                  1·
                  13 days ago

                  if you think that’s all it was, that explains a lot. who are you to tell me what I have and haven’t experienced.

                  • Loose_Sandwich9217
                    1·
                    13 days ago

                    Mb for not realising phrenology was a personal feeling you had comparable to sexuality ig

        • Loose_Sandwich9217
          11·
          13 days ago

          Very very different from blanchard lmao, sorry for having experiences that hurt your feelings ig

          • pleasantaftertastesOP
            4·
            13 days ago

            this is scientific fact for all trans women is what Blanchard is arguing. do you seriously believe that to be the case? that all trans women are HSTS or AGP? do you seriously actually believe that?

            • Loose_Sandwich9217
              2·
              13 days ago

              Well not all but a very large number are agp, some are hsts but not many

              Also you’re arguing it applies to no one

              • pleasantaftertastesOP
                3·
                13 days ago

                you don’t get it half way. say some trans women are born men who were made trans by external experience and just do it for sexusl fetish and are inherently predatory. this is an all or nothing theory by definition.

                • Loose_Sandwich9217
                  1·
                  13 days ago

                  Why? Do you think all trans people are the same and have to all do it for thr same reason? Why would thst be the case? That’s retarded and also not a reason to say something is fake

                  • pleasantaftertastesOP
                    4·
                    13 days ago

                    BECAUSE THAT’S HOW THE THEORY WORKS, GENIUS. EVERYONE IT DOESN’T APPLY TO US A LIAR, FOR SEXUAL REASONS. ITS AN OBJECTIVE CLAIM ABOUT ALLLLL TRANS WOMEN.