>Be me, John 44.

>Transition anyway because you’re super rich from anesthesiologist work

>Abandon wife and kids like a boss.

>see Ray Blanchard’s work.

>Your new bible.JPEG

>Call trannies men in dresses who just have a fetish because you can’t imagine being trans without seeing it through sex.

>assert your theory as objective fact

>all evidence that contradicts is made up or a lie

>it’s so shit even TERFs don’t bother using it as ammo

>only believed by those with serious brainworms because it’s a meme scientifically.

>don’t apply it to yourself

>retire happy

Praise be, she is the queen even above Blanchard. If you like Blanchard more, you’re sexist.

  • Loose_Sandwich9217
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Mb for not realising phrenology was a personal feeling you had comparable to sexuality ig

    • pleasantaftertastesOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      it’s something you experience, genius. it affects your thinking and can become instrinsic. sound familiar?

      • Loose_Sandwich9217
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        What has someone personally measured the bumps on your skull or something, even if that were the case it wouldn’t make race science real

        • pleasantaftertastesOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          white people when you say that the pseudoscience dedicated to proving black people were biologically inferior for hundreds years actually exists beyond measuring skulls.

            • pleasantaftertastesOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              18 days ago

              are you seriously claiming that phrenology has had no effect on the lives of modern Africans and African Americans? it’s pseudoscience, but it has function and a grounding in quasi-believable phenomena. regardless, there is no point in debating this with you. I can’t change every mind.

              • Loose_Sandwich9217
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                18 days ago

                No? But it’s not an objective experience like sexuality which you can say “it’s real!” to, not remotely conparable

                • pleasantaftertastesOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  18 days ago

                  sexuality is not an objective universal experience. nothing really is which is the reason that you can’t say this “theory” is objective. it’s as real as God.

                  • Loose_Sandwich9217
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    18 days ago

                    Sexuality is absolutely an objective experience what, what in attracted to is just objective I know