>Be me, John 44.

>Transition anyway because you’re super rich from anesthesiologist work

>Abandon wife and kids like a boss.

>see Ray Blanchard’s work.

>Your new bible.JPEG

>Call trannies men in dresses who just have a fetish because you can’t imagine being trans without seeing it through sex.

>assert your theory as objective fact

>all evidence that contradicts is made up or a lie

>it’s so shit even TERFs don’t bother using it as ammo

>only believed by those with serious brainworms because it’s a meme scientifically.

>don’t apply it to yourself

>retire happy

Praise be, she is the queen even above Blanchard. If you like Blanchard more, you’re sexist.

  • pleasantaftertastesOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    it’s something you experience, genius. it affects your thinking and can become instrinsic. sound familiar?

    • Loose_Sandwich9217
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      What has someone personally measured the bumps on your skull or something, even if that were the case it wouldn’t make race science real

      • pleasantaftertastesOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        white people when you say that the pseudoscience dedicated to proving black people were biologically inferior for hundreds years actually exists beyond measuring skulls.

          • pleasantaftertastesOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            are you seriously claiming that phrenology has had no effect on the lives of modern Africans and African Americans? it’s pseudoscience, but it has function and a grounding in quasi-believable phenomena. regardless, there is no point in debating this with you. I can’t change every mind.

            • Loose_Sandwich9217
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              No? But it’s not an objective experience like sexuality which you can say “it’s real!” to, not remotely conparable

              • pleasantaftertastesOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                sexuality is not an objective universal experience. nothing really is which is the reason that you can’t say this “theory” is objective. it’s as real as God.

                • Loose_Sandwich9217
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  Sexuality is absolutely an objective experience what, what in attracted to is just objective I know

                  • pleasantaftertastesOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 days ago

                    it’s not universally similar or even objectively guaranteed. no, blanchard isn’t the Jesus of psychology who somehow understands literally everything