For one, the vast majority of women are androphiles and for agps that’s jot remotely true so that makes no sense
For 2, agp is a sexuality not just a fetish and therefore also has non sexual romantic aspects and idk maybe I’m crazy but I don’t think most cis women are attracted to themselves in an autoromantic sense
For 3, the moser study is nonsense
Women liking tall men and feeling feminine doesn’t make them autogynephiles 😭


look at my sexologists holy shit we’re genuinely cooked. I could make anyone here believe anything unfalsifiable if it called them sissy crossdressers. unbelievable. look at my leftists dawg
well erm actually agp is real because… because it just is, okay! it’s like God!
It’s not even a self hate thing this is literally just true 😭
Like agp as described doesn’t apply to cis women just factually
this is so retarded it pisses me off. more trannies need to go to college or some shit. I couldn’t read until I was a teenager and I seem to be the only person who can here. you people will eat up any slop left behind by rich white people who hate you if it calls you men and has big words. unbelievable. just unbelievable.
I don’t think agp makes anyone men?
Also again AS DESCRIBED agp factually doesn’t apply to cis women
the book is called men in mens bodies for the love of God
It’s a play on the whole “women trapped in Mens bodies thing” because she was specifically talking about people who weren’t traditionally feminine before trooning. Bad title og but she doesn’t literally think troons are men she is one
she literally says agps are men.
pretransition, they’re just men with fetishes. judged based on sexual orientation. the great case of tranny confirmation bias.
She literally is one and is transitioned 😭
when i call myself a man in self hate slop you call me regarded, but if its a book length has citations, and quotes blanchy its suddenly objectively true?
open the schools. the most base and core part of any theory is that must be falsifiable. This theory is literally impossible to prove wrong, and that’s on purpose. the researcher is always right.