For one, the vast majority of women are androphiles and for agps that’s jot remotely true so that makes no sense

For 2, agp is a sexuality not just a fetish and therefore also has non sexual romantic aspects and idk maybe I’m crazy but I don’t think most cis women are attracted to themselves in an autoromantic sense

For 3, the moser study is nonsense

Women liking tall men and feeling feminine doesn’t make them autogynephiles 😭

  • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    I don’t think agp makes anyone men?

    Also again AS DESCRIBED agp factually doesn’t apply to cis women

      • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s a play on the whole “women trapped in Mens bodies thing” because she was specifically talking about people who weren’t traditionally feminine before trooning. Bad title og but she doesn’t literally think troons are men she is one

          • pleasantaftertastes
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            pretransition, they’re just men with fetishes. judged based on sexual orientation. the great case of tranny confirmation bias.

            • Narcissus
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 days ago

              when i call myself a man in self hate slop you call me regarded, but if its a book length has citations, and quotes blanchy its suddenly objectively true?

            • pleasantaftertastes
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              open the schools. the most base and core part of any theory is that must be falsifiable. This theory is literally impossible to prove wrong, and that’s on purpose. the researcher is always right.

              • pleasantaftertastes
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 days ago

                the theory can’t categorize anybody. sloppy, lacking nuance. all of it is based on a comparison from straight cis men to trans women. most of it Blanchard doesn’t even believe in anymore. Like usual, this is another psychologist trying to think of literally everything through the lens of a man’s dick. and you people eat it up.

              • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                I don’t think it’s entirely possibly to even make a theory of why people transition be falsifiable fully because it has to rely on anecdotal evidence, so unless literally everything everyone has ever said about trans people is also bullshit idk what exactly you want

                • pleasantaftertastes
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  the problem is that Anne and the theory itself EXPLICITLY DISCOUNT ANY ANECDOTE THAT DISAGREES

                  • Loose_Sandwich9217OP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 days ago

                    Ok but troons do lie all the time actually how do you account for that… and what about rhe annecodates that do I mean you’re telling me I don’t have it when I literally do, aren’t you the same?