No bathrooms for troons and poons because single sex spaces 
combined with the facial rec shit, is it time for the mass british exodus?
The full thing is here https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a0de69fe0994f7c13d7b411/EHRC_Code_of_Practice_for_services__public_functions_and_associations__2_.pdf
It is very bad. I’m so sorry to the uk tranners, fuck labour forever
Source?
Still needs to be approved by Parliament but it is likely to pass
Oh so there is an update? Whats new? That ss is old stuff
It was issued today and will be the statutory guidance (if passed by Parliament) and will in effect inform the view about enforcement of the sex provisions of the equality act
Ok yeah but what’s changed since the draft from a while ago
Not too much (it’s basically just a larger version of it), but they should have changed it to be in line with the odd good law ruling about it
Oh wait nvm this is just the sc ruling this has nothing to do with toilets
deleted by creator
It’s actually the guidance issued after court judgements that aren’t as misleading as this and this will in effect act as a bathroom ban if passed
Where’s the actual bathroom ban? Bathrooms were never protected spaces so what you showed in that screenshot doesn’t apply to them
They could be counted as single sex spaces and therefore this guidance could be seen as applying to them
This is written where? If they could do this that would’ve been a thing ages ago
Bathroom have been refered to as single sex in court cases before for exmaple see - https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/good-law-project-EHRC-AC-2025-1953-judgment-13Feb26.pdf
Where in that case it was said
The Minister for Women and Equalities made no overall submission on whether the Claimants’ claim should succeed or fail, but did make submissions on this point. She submitted that if single-sex lavatories were provided they could continue to be a single sex-service for the purpose of the provisions in Schedule 3 to EA 2010 notwithstanding what she referred to as “derogations” – i.e., situations where (taking lavatories as the example) a man used the female lavatory. The examples relied on were of a piece with those the Claimants relied on. Based on those examples the Minister submitted that a trans-inclusive lavatory (as above, see paragraph 38) could continue to have the protection of one or both of the exceptions at paragraph 26 and 27 of Schedule 3 to the EA 2010 as a single-sex provision.
Yeau
I FUCKING HATE CISSOIDS. TOTAL CISSOID DEATH NOW. FUCK THIS SHIT. THEY JUST WANT US DEAD
Direct action time refuse to comply with the immoral laws
RESISTANCE IS THE ONLY SOLUTION
deleted by creator
This is nothing new, if you read it it’s literally verbatim the sc ruling. We’re not banned from toilets yet at least by this ss
Sounds kinda unenforceable but that’s probably not the point anyway
deleted by creator
It’s probably mostly there to virtue signal and allow some individual discrimination from employers who might know that you’re a tranny
deleted by creator
Oh yeah that too ofc
deleted by creator
Ig it‘s time to avoid public bathrooms then
deleted by creator
So they whine about GRC not needing a diagnosis for today they make all of this useless, what matters if someone change It anyways If the GRC is useless
tcd.
I wish my country didn’t hate me so much as I do actually like living here
