“Rapestick, Rapist Hormones, Testosterone Tumors, Bad gender, the ugly sex…”
They all just sound like very strong internalized misandry and a hatred for masculinity and one’s body and maybe that is simply the result from having a really bad father figure, not being very manly as a child, high masculine expectations and terrible socialisation, and so this results in people trying to flee from manhood into something where they think that the grass is greener on the other side when that is not garaunteed. And so maybe this is just us trying to compensate into the opposite direction and run away from masculinity because the only people who modeled it for us where abusive and so we resented it in ourselves. Maybe we are just hyper sensitive men who developed deep seeted gendered self hatred…
no lmao. plenty of gay men are hyper masculine, look at tom of finland’s drawings.
Yeah but I am talking about troons, not about gay men… and also maybe masculine gay men (which are almost always just tops and bears) are simply the straight version of gay because they are the active, not the passive (kind of like roman sexuality) and so thereby they simply are not actually “gay” because in a sense they still have the same role of domination and being the active partner, that straight men have and so they are more similar to straight men in those regards than to the effeminate gay bottom.
So… those who turn into tops and bears are just straight men who might hate women so much that they instead just have sex with men or that fetishize male youth or them simply perverse in the sense of being functionally bisexual but choosing to simply be with men because they simply adopted a certain sexual script which is being with men.
And those who turn into bottoms are more like the people described in the post and are more like women and passive and the complete opposite. So kinda like there are only two sexualities and two genders which is the feminine passive and the masculine active
ok so a) top and bottom is not that strict, theres plenty of switches and sides. also b) masculine bottoms exist and less masculine tops. like this is just you projecting an idea of how gay people are onto what is actually a very diverse group of people.
Maybe switches and sides are fake because they always prefer on thing and then that thing is the thing they are… and idk masculine bottoms just dissociate or something or have a scewed internal self perception compared and so they are not aware of their masculinity when they are in this position… so like mismatch… or maybe they are outwardly masculine but simply not sufficently so to not be bottoms.
but theyre real. you cant just say “must be fake” when data that doesnt fit your theory comes up…and masciline botto.s dont dissassociate either… this is all just treating the ideal of heteronormative sexuality with masculine active and femine passive as being an actual law of sexuality and gender as opposed to an imposed framing/restriction. people dont actually work like that.
Yeah… but are you sure… seems weird to me…
yes im sure lol. like. my upbri n ging was completely traditional with a lot of care and attention given to me and yet im still a tranny faggot and the feelibgs havent gone away even after being forced to repress. so all of this stuff is complete nonsense