Chemistry follows mathematical principles too, but it’s statistics and probability rather than desecrate math. The discrete parts of chemistry are observational, and then the rules are made to describe a trend. Much like a linear regression trend line, the rules don’t perfectly describe every situation, but that’s what makes chemistry so fun- you can make anything can happen with enough effort. It’s more exciting than physics where it’s like “This is the Carnot engine cycle- it’s cool but this is the most efficient engine cycle there will ever be.” Maybe the fun in physics starts with the unsolved problems? I think it really is a personality test in the end.

I learned thermodynamics with chemistry even though it’s basically physics, but I liked that. Thinking of thermodynamics as a statistical distribution, and entropy as a system moving towards more statistically likely states was helpful and intuitive to me. The actual physics classes I took were classical physics.

I was very pleased with using infinite rectangles to calculate the area under a curve when learning limits and integrals, so I also understand the appeal of pure math.

Biology is fun as well, and it has a bit of everything doesn’t it? I liked taxonomy, but there wasn’t anything in biology that was very moving to me even if there were lots of interesting things.

I also like economics, which is mathematical certainly even worse for being chaotic. Nothing more random than human behavior.

No offense taken, but also skill issue if it doesn’t make sense? I sucked at physics and it was certainly a skill issue.