How is it different? If you have cispassing body measurements, then you have cispassing body. And honlarpers do exist, it’s more like a bddoid with more negative implications.
speaking seriously, bodies can be shaped very differently within the same major measurements. that’s my point. and that’s why I generally dislike measurement posting, because bodies with seemingly good measures can actually be fucked up, while raw numbers will serve as a ropefuel for others.
speaking unseriously, honlarpers don’t exist, it’s an urban legend
Conclusion: we should do more measurements, measure every single circumference and breadth over every line of your body. /jk
Sorry, it’s hard for me to visualize. I would need to see people with exact measurements, with one being non-passing and the other one passing, which is unrealistic to ask, I understand.
Also, only half-joking. People sometimes pick out good separate measurements, like underbust and waist for example, and then call both of them luckshit measurements, when in reality only underbust is good, but waist is very straight and bricky.
>we should do more measurements, measure every single circumference and breadth over every line of your body
it actually gives better picture unironically but it’s hard to visualize all that
>People sometimes pick out good separate measurements
that is also true. for example, 72 cm underbust and 63 cm waist might sound good for some because they view those measurements separately, but even according to ansur those are very moidly proportions
You sure can. Doesn’t make you a hon anyway, when you have cis passing body measurements.
lienuke
Why? With cis passing body, you will be twinkhon at worst. A hon is specifically someone who doesn’t pass in body and face.
you didn’t say “cispassing body”, you said “cispassing body measurements”
also honlarpers don’t exist, it’s a psyop
How is it different? If you have cispassing body measurements, then you have cispassing body. And honlarpers do exist, it’s more like a bddoid with more negative implications.
speaking seriously, bodies can be shaped very differently within the same major measurements. that’s my point. and that’s why I generally dislike measurement posting, because bodies with seemingly good measures can actually be fucked up, while raw numbers will serve as a ropefuel for others.
speaking unseriously, honlarpers don’t exist, it’s an urban legend
Conclusion: we should do more measurements, measure every single circumference and breadth over every line of your body. /jk
Sorry, it’s hard for me to visualize. I would need to see people with exact measurements, with one being non-passing and the other one passing, which is unrealistic to ask, I understand.
Also, only half-joking. People sometimes pick out good separate measurements, like underbust and waist for example, and then call both of them luckshit measurements, when in reality only underbust is good, but waist is very straight and bricky.
>we should do more measurements, measure every single circumference and breadth over every line of your body
it actually gives better picture unironically but it’s hard to visualize all that
>People sometimes pick out good separate measurements
that is also true. for example, 72 cm underbust and 63 cm waist might sound good for some because they view those measurements separately, but even according to ansur those are very moidly proportions