• Cambion
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    How is it different? If you have cispassing body measurements, then you have cispassing body. And honlarpers do exist, it’s more like a bddoid with more negative implications.

    • snoothon_possoid
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      speaking seriously, bodies can be shaped very differently within the same major measurements. that’s my point. and that’s why I generally dislike measurement posting, because bodies with seemingly good measures can actually be fucked up, while raw numbers will serve as a ropefuel for others.

      speaking unseriously, honlarpers don’t exist, it’s an urban legend

      • Cambion
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Conclusion: we should do more measurements, measure every single circumference and breadth over every line of your body. /jk

        Sorry, it’s hard for me to visualize. I would need to see people with exact measurements, with one being non-passing and the other one passing, which is unrealistic to ask, I understand.

        Also, only half-joking. People sometimes pick out good separate measurements, like underbust and waist for example, and then call both of them luckshit measurements, when in reality only underbust is good, but waist is very straight and bricky.

        • snoothon_possoid
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          >we should do more measurements, measure every single circumference and breadth over every line of your body

          it actually gives better picture unironically but it’s hard to visualize all that

          >People sometimes pick out good separate measurements

          that is also true. for example, 72 cm underbust and 63 cm waist might sound good for some because they view those measurements separately, but even according to ansur those are very moidly proportions