>Be me, John 44.

>Transition anyway because you’re super rich from anesthesiologist work

>Abandon wife and kids like a boss.

>see Ray Blanchard’s work.

>Your new bible.JPEG

>Call trannies men in dresses who just have a fetish because you can’t imagine being trans without seeing it through sex.

>assert your theory as objective fact

>all evidence that contradicts is made up or a lie

>it’s so shit even TERFs don’t bother using it as ammo

>only believed by those with serious brainworms because it’s a meme scientifically.

>don’t apply it to yourself

>retire happy

Praise be, she is the queen even above Blanchard. If you like Blanchard more, you’re sexist.

  • its_ogre
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    You both are talking completely past each other. Loose sandwich is trying to say that agp as a concept exists somewhere - i.e., at least one person has an autoerotic attraction to seeing themself as a woman - while you’re getting hung up on the GRAND UNIFIED AGP/HSTS BLANCHARDIAN THEORY™ which I feel like at this point almost nobody fully agrees with.

    Do you disagree that at least one person has experienced an autoerotic arousal dressing in feminine clothes or seeing themself as a woman?

    Surely you don’t because sissies exist

    • pleasantaftertastesOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      THE THEORY IS INHERENTLY ALL OR NOTHING. AM I THE ONLY PERSON HERE WHO HAS READ BLANCHARD?

      • pleasantaftertastesOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        YOU SERIOUSLY CANNOT TELL ME THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LESBIAN TRANS WOMEN AND SISSIES? AM I ON POL?

        • its_ogre
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          huhhhh??? wtf are you talking about, I already said I don’t fully agree with blanchardism. I’m trying to say that I’VE experienced an autoerotic arousal dressing in women’s clothes when I was a kid. And I’m trying to reconcile this with me being trans (what im saying is that it makes me faketrans)

          Just call me a faketrans sissy already ik you want to

          • pleasantaftertastesOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            I don’t care about you. why is everybody using their personal anecdote? it doesn’t matter! in the sense of Blanchard’s theory being true. Blanchard didn’t even identify arousal correctly when these concepts were made! arousal isn’t just purely sexual!

            • its_ogre
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              BECAUSE THE PERSONAL ANECDOTE IS WHAT MAKES ME FEEL FAKETRANS AND WHY IM SHAMEFUL

              • pleasantaftertastesOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 days ago

                it doesn’t prove the theory true, or make you AGP. “arousal” not erotic, just a rise in emotion or feeling. is common for trans people

                • its_ogre
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  ? lol you don’t fully understand what I mean when I say I was agp as a kid, do you. You just have no relation or understanding of it. This is the disconnect, I’m actually just a sissy pretending to be trans