For one, the vast majority of women are androphiles and for agps that’s jot remotely true so that makes no sense
For 2, agp is a sexuality not just a fetish and therefore also has non sexual romantic aspects and idk maybe I’m crazy but I don’t think most cis women are attracted to themselves in an autoromantic sense
For 3, the moser study is nonsense
Women liking tall men and feeling feminine doesn’t make them autogynephiles 😭
the vast majority of agps are bisexual nd thus androphiles tho. even blanchy doesnt stand by meta attraction qnymore.
I don’t consider most bi agps androphiles…
this just in, liking men romantically and sexually is not androphilia. this is your brain on sexology folks!
Meta attraction isn’t androphilia
people fantasize about specific men or have crushes on them but its qll um meta attraction because women cant be bisexual as they dont have sexualities.
like you know thats what bailey et al beleive right? its complete nonsense
Ok but lots of agps don’t do that, “faceless men” in fantasies is a recorded phenomenon… literally just talking to some bi agps it becomes very clear they’re not androphilic
ok but thats not exactly exclusive to just trans women. and faceless women isnt exactlt unknown in gynephilia. there is “meta attraction” in the sense of the satisfaction of fitting the social role of heterosexuality but to claim it comprises the whole of all trans women’s androphilia is just stupid
Ok but it’s literally just not androphilia 😭, if yoh were androphilic you’d have absolutely no reason whatsoever to fantasie about faceless men
And yes because some women are comphet, it’s far more common among trans women tho
source for that? like women fantasizing about being swept away by a prince charming or a dark haired billionaire arent actually thinking of a specific man. and itsnot like gynephiles always have a specific woman theyre thinking of either. like i think imagining “an act id like to do with a aprtner” doesnt require a specific partner to be fantasized about for most people.