Yeah it’s trans people vs cis men and cis women. P sure trans people came out to be 2x and some change more likely. I sadly am short on references and brainpower right now I was diggin’ for more
it is weird that it doesnt distinguish between trans women and trans men but obviously it has all trans people higher than all cis people which i think is enough to safely disprove the above graphic lol
am i stupid or it mentions trans-cis differences only
Yeah it’s trans people vs cis men and cis women. P sure trans people came out to be 2x and some change more likely. I sadly am short on references and brainpower right now I was diggin’ for more
like not trans women in relation to cis women
it is weird that it doesnt distinguish between trans women and trans men but obviously it has all trans people higher than all cis people which i think is enough to safely disprove the above graphic lol
insane that all the linked studies do this too. holy shit.
Finding mtf vs ftm studies is proving to be quite difficult actually so I might have to Logical Fallacy: Appeal to Anecdote no jutsu this
Like less than 50 trans women responded here so they determined trans men were 2x likely to be assaulted
The reason I think it’s trans women is V-Coding, but then again that might not be reported at all. I think V-Coding would break the scales tbh
Maybe this is just a preconceived bias with no merit. Who knows? I found https://transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/usts/USTS-Full-Report-Dec17.pdf
But I didn’t see if it broke down how many respondents were ftm vs how many were mtf.
Still think they should both be higher than cis people in the big kink survey. That was my main contention anyhow.
thatk you for your efforts at least