>Be me, John 44.

>Transition anyway because you’re super rich from anesthesiologist work

>Abandon wife and kids like a boss.

>see Ray Blanchard’s work.

>Your new bible.JPEG

>Call trannies men in dresses who just have a fetish because you can’t imagine being trans without seeing it through sex.

>assert your theory as objective fact

>all evidence that contradicts is made up or a lie

>it’s so shit even TERFs don’t bother using it as ammo

>only believed by those with serious brainworms because it’s a meme scientifically.

>don’t apply it to yourself

>retire happy

Praise be, she is the queen even above Blanchard. If you like Blanchard more, you’re sexist.

  • pleasantaftertastesOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I don’t think you understand me. I think you think I’m making objective claims about you. I don’t think it’s clear enough that I’m not speaking about you. I’m not. but you alone aren’t enough data to prove Blanchard’s concept to be true, nor is it the best explanation for the data we do have. it’s not entirely about you. even if you ticked every box, he would still be wrong.

    • Loose_Sandwich9217
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      ok but hed be right about me and agp as a concept would be real (youve denied it is at all like 7 times)

      • pleasantaftertastesOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        it’s not, because he’s wrong. one example isn’t enough to claim something is an objective truth. for the concept to be correct, it would have to apply all trans women, who would secretly be men with a fetish. sometimes, things aren’t about us.

              • pleasantaftertastesOP
                link
                fedilink
                azərbaycan dili
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                not everything is about you, and your thoughts alone don’t mean that most trans women arent male perverts in dresses. I don’t care about your anecdote in terms of proving most trans women are men in dresses

                  • pleasantaftertastesOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 days ago

                    IT HAS TO BE UNIVERSAL AS PER THE THEORY? you can’t have it both ways! either the concert is true as per Blanchard And Lawrence and most trans women are male fetishist in dresses made trans by external factors and sex shit, or trans women AREN’T sissies in dresses!